08 · Animals · in-depth guide

Jellyfish, storms, and infrasound

A long HERD article for first-time readers: why jellyfish may sense an approaching storm, where massive swarms hurt resorts and power plants, and what a gentle acoustic barrier means. Grounded in 196 sources.

Library → Jellyfish and storms

Sailors have long noticed jellyfish moving away from shore before bad weather. That is not necessarily weather forecasting — but jellyfish have balance organs, and storms create very low sound waves that travel far through water. Put biology, physics, and real intake failures together and you get a story you can test.

Ten sections below, from simple to detailed. We explain unfamiliar terms the first time they appear and label open questions as hypotheses. At the end: the full bibliography with search.

Risk map Infrastructure Acoustics HERD Jellyfish R&D →

Watch: Jellyfish Acoustics

A short HERD film: how jellyfish sense low-frequency sound, why blooms hit resorts and intakes, and what a gentle acoustic corridor could mean. The full wiki continues below.

How a jellyfish senses water

Around the bell margin, jellyfish have tiny balance organs called statocysts — sometimes described as an “ear without a brain.” Inside are mineral grains and hair-like sensors that respond to tilt, current, and bumps in the water.

Lab work shows that very low frequencies (infrasound) can affect that sensitive tissue. That is why researchers ask whether a jellyfish can “hear” a distant storm long before surface waves arrive — reliability still needs field tests.

Jellyfish balance organ diagram
Balance organ: mineral grains press on sensitive hairs — the jellyfish feels tilt and water movement.

Storms, low sound, and moving offshore

Storm fronts create infrasound — sound below what humans usually hear — that can travel tens of kilometers through air and water. People often feel it as pressure or a deep rumble, not ordinary noise.

What is fairly solid: jellyfish respond to very low frequencies. What is still a hypothesis: they use that signal to forecast storms and leave in time — that must be checked coast by coast.

Jellyfish moving offshore before a storm
Hypothesis: storm's low sounds may reach jellyfish before clouds appear.
Knowledge boundary

We separate checked facts from working guesses — clearer for readers and fairer for science.

Mass swarms around the world

Jellyfish blooms — sudden masses of millions of animals — do not rise everywhere at the same rate. But in many seas they repeat more often when warming, nutrient pollution, overfishing, and coastal change overlap.

For resorts and power operators the practical question is simpler: does it happen again and again at your intake, season after season?

Quick facts

Map of risky coasts

Below are 18 planetary regions where jellyfish swarms keep coming back. Priority A: Andaman, Japan, Israel, northern Australia, Mexico; B: Brazil, Caribbean, Mediterranean; C: historical and watch zones.

Map of risky coasts worldwide
Three priority levels (A highest): from Andaman to Mexico, Brazil and the Caribbean — where HERD runs pilots and talks with resorts and utilities.
RegionTierTypical speciesImpact
Andaman: Phuket / Krabi / Phang Nga (TH)Tier A (high)Aurelia, cubozoaTourism, hotels, desal, marinas
Gulf of Thailand (Samui, Pattaya)Tier A (high)Aurelia, RhizostomaBeaches, mariculture
East Coast TH (Rayong-Trat)Tier A (high)AureliaIndustrial cooling water
Seto Inland Sea / Osaka Bay (JP)Tier A (high)Nemopilema nomuraiFisheries, intakes
Sea of Japan (Fukui, Shimane)Tier A (high)Nemopilema, AureliaNuclear intake incidents
Yellow / East China Sea (CN, KR)Tier B (medium)Nemopilema, CyaneaLarge blooms, energy risk
Western Mediterranean (ES, FR, IT)Tier B (medium)Rhizostoma, Pelagia noctilucaTourism, fisheries
Adriatic coastTier B (medium)RhizostomaMarinas, beaches
Israel Med coast (Ashkelon, Hadera desal)Tier A (high)Rhopilema nomadica, AureliaDesal intakes, water security
North Australia (QLD, NT, WA — stinger coast)Tier A (high)Chironex fleckeri, IrukandjiBox jellyfish, yachting, stinger season
US Gulf / East CoastTier C (watch)Sea nettle, MnemiopsisFisheries, plant operation
Black Sea / Sea of AzovTier C (watch)Mnemiopsis leidyiHistorical ecosystem collapse
Irish Sea / UK westTier C (watch)Various speciesTourism and pilot monitoring
Malta / Eastern Med islandsTier C (watch)RhizostomaDesal + tourism
West Africa (Benguela)Tier C (watch)Large scyphozoansFisheries pressure
Mexico Gulf & Yucatán (Veracruz, Cancún, Campeche)Tier A (high)Aurelia, Tamoya, StomolophusTourism, PEMEX cooling, cruises
Brazil SE coast (Santos, Rio, São Paulo state)Tier B (medium)Lychnorhiza, Olindias, AureliaBeaches, Angra nuclear, fisheries
Caribbean (Cuba, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, Dominican Rep.)Tier B (medium)Aurelia, Cassiopea, cubozoaTourism, cruise ports, island desal
🇮🇱 Israel: desalination under bloom pressure

The Mediterranean coast is one of the world's most desal-dependent regions. Summer swarms of Rhopilema nomadica and Aurelia have repeatedly clogged seawater intakes at plants such as Ashkelon and Hadera. The 2019 event shut water supply for hours. For a water-stressed country this is not a beach nuisance — it is water and energy security. Tier A for HERD utility pilots.

🇦🇺 Northern Australia: box jellyfish and Irukandji

Queensland, the Northern Territory and WA are home to Chironex fleckeri and the tiny but deadly Irukandji. Stinger season closes the water for half the year; nets and stinger suits are standard. The coastline runs for thousands of kilometres — premium yachting, resorts, guest safety in wild tropical bays. A humane LF barrier is both a medical and commercial case — jellyfish R&D.

🇲🇽 Mexico: Gulf, Yucatán and HERD LATAM

Veracruz, Cancún and Campeche — Aurelia, Tamoya and egg-yolk Stomolophus: beaches, PEMEX cooling and cruises. HERD LATAM starts here — Popocatépetl pilot plus coasts where blooms hit tourism and infrastructure.

🇧🇷 Brazil: SE coast from Santos to Rio

Summer blooms of Lychnorhiza and Olindias close São Paulo and Rio beaches. Nearby: Angra nuclear and one of Latin America's busiest ports. Monitoring plus gentle acoustics is a natural pilot for resorts and utilities.

🏝 Caribbean: cruises, islands, cubomedusa

Cuba, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic — Aurelia, upside-down Cassiopea and cubomedusa at busy beaches. Cruise ports and island desalination turn blooms into infrastructure risk, not exotic sea life.

Power plants and seawater intakes

Coastal nuclear and thermal plants and desalination plants pump millions of liters through screens and filters. A dense jellyfish swarm can clog them within hours — throughput drops and shutdown risk rises.

That has happened in Japan, the UK, Sweden, Israel, and northern Australia — from nuclear intakes to beach closures in stinger season.

YearSiteCountryConsequence
2011Shimane Nuclear PPJapanCooling-water restriction
2011Torness Nuclear PPUKTemporary shutdown
2013Oskarshamn Nuclear PPSwedenMajor reactor stop
2019Desalination plantIsraelIntake clogging
2023Northern beaches (QLD/NT)AustraliaBeach closures, stinger season
2021TornessUKRepeat jellyfish event
2024-2025Multiple coastal plantsChinaRegional bloom pressure
Jellyfish-clogged seawater intake
Power plant or desal intake: a dense swarm can become an emergency within hours.

Key species

Aurelia aurita moon jellyfish
Aurelia aurita

Mass swarms — reputational and infrastructure damage at beaches and intakes.

Rhizostoma Mediterranean barrel jellyfish
Rhizostoma / Cotylorhiza

Typical Mediterranean bloom species — large barrel jellies near resorts.

Rhopilema nomadica swarm near desal intake
Rhopilema nomadica

Invasive species on Israel and Levant coasts — summer swarms clog desal intakes.

Nemopilema nomurai giant jellyfish
Nemopilema nomurai

Giant blooms in East Asia — fisheries and water intakes at risk.

Chironex fleckeri box jellyfish
Chironex / Irukandji

High medical risk — northern Australia, stinger season, yachting safety.

Pelagia noctiluca mauve stinger
Pelagia noctiluca

Frequent painful stings in Mediterranean tourist zones.

Sound: what is proven

Low-frequency sensitivity in jellyfish is documented. At fish intakes, tuned acoustic deterrents already work well when frequency and level are chosen carefully.

The open jellyfish question: can you gently steer a swarm aside without damaging balance organs? That is the core testable idea behind HERD.

Gentle sound barrier concept
HERD idea: a quiet low-frequency field at the intake — steer jellyfish away without killing them.

How people cope today

MethodProsCons
Physical netsReliable nearshore barrierCostly and maintenance-heavy
Bubble curtainsUseful hydrodynamic exclusionEnergy intensive, site-specific
Mechanical removalFast short-term reductionLethal and ecologically controversial
Fish AFD systemsMature evidence for fishNot calibrated for jellyfish
HERD LF barrierPotentially humane and scalableStill in R&D

HERD network

HERD proposes two steps: low-cost coastal sensors catch early signs of swarming, then trials of a gentle sound “corridor” to steer jellyfish away from intakes.

The aim is practical risk management for resorts, ports, and utilities before beaches close or plants trip offline.

HERD sensor deployment by boat and drone
Field setup: small boat, industrial drone, and a waterproof sensor on rock or buoy.

Infrasound & jellyfish — extended bibliography · 196 sources

This is the project's largest bibliography — jellyfish, infrasound, and bioacoustics together — part of the HERD library of 318 sources. Each paper gets a short plain-language note. Search by title, author, topic, or tag.

196
Sources 1-75
  1. peer-reviewed Sole M. et al. (2016). Evidence of Cnidarians sensitivity to sound after exposure to low frequency noise. Scientific Reports. link

    Experimental evidence that cnidarians (jellyfish, corals) detect or respond to low-frequency sound.

  2. peer-reviewed Wang R. et al. (2021). Jellyfish otolith-inspired MEMS vector hydrophone for low-frequency detection. Microsystems and Nanoengineering. link

    Bio-inspired MEMS hydrophone design modeled on jellyfish statocysts for low-frequency underwater sensing.

  3. review Purcell J.E., Uye S., Lo W.T. (2007). Anthropogenic causes of jellyfish blooms and their direct consequences for humans. Marine Ecology Progress Series. link

    Review linking human activities (fishing, eutrophication, climate) to jellyfish blooms and societal impacts.

  4. peer-reviewed Maes J. et al. (2004). Field evaluation of a sound system to reduce estuarine fish intake rates at a power plant cooling water inlet. Journal of Fish Biology. link

    Jellyfish or debris blocking power-plant cooling-water intakes — field tests, incidents, or management guidance.

  5. peer-reviewed Sonny D. et al. (2006). Reactions of cyprinids to infrasound at a nuclear power plant cooling-water inlet. Journal of Fish Biology. link

    Jellyfish or debris blocking power-plant cooling-water intakes — field tests, incidents, or management guidance.

  6. peer-reviewed Woith H., Petersen G.M., Hainzl S., Dahm T. (2018). Can Animals Predict Earthquakes? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. link

    Critical review of claims that animals (including marine species) can forecast earthquakes.

  7. org EPRI (2017). Cooling Water Intake Debris Management: Jellyfish and Jellyfish-Like Organisms. Electric Power Research Institute. link

    Jellyfish or debris blocking power-plant cooling-water intakes — field tests, incidents, or management guidance.

  8. history Spangenberg D.B. (1986). Statocyst structure and function in Cnidaria. Fortschritte der Zoologie.

    Balance organ (statocyst) structure and function in gelatinous zooplankton and related invertebrates.

  9. review Tiemann H. et al. (2009). Gelatinous zooplankton statocyst and sensory biology overview. Marine Ecology.

    Balance organ (statocyst) structure and function in gelatinous zooplankton and related invertebrates.

  10. peer-reviewed Mooney T.A. et al. (2010). Ontogeny of hearing in the squid Loligo pealeii. Biological Bulletin. link

    Peer-reviewed research paper on the topic cited above. Focus: «Ontogeny of hearing in the squid Loligo pealeii».

  11. peer-reviewed Budelmann B.U. (1979). Hair cell responses in the octopus statocyst. Journal of Comparative Physiology.

    Balance organ (statocyst) structure and function in gelatinous zooplankton and related invertebrates.

  12. review Bedard A.J., Georges T.M. (2000). Atmospheric Infrasound. Physics Today. link

    Introductory overview of atmospheric infrasound sources, propagation, and monitoring.

  13. peer-reviewed Elbing B.R., Petrin C.E., Van Den Broeke M.S. (2019). Measurement and characterization of infrasound from a tornado-producing storm. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. link

    Infrasound generated by severe storms, tornadoes, or thunderstorm vortices.

  14. peer-reviewed Waxler R., Gilbert K.E. (2006). The radiation of atmospheric microbaroms by ocean waves. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. link

    Microbaroms — continuous infrasound from ocean surface waves interacting with the atmosphere.

  15. peer-reviewed Condon R.H. et al. (2013). Recurrent jellyfish blooms are a consequence of global oscillations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. link

    Large-scale drivers of recurring jellyfish blooms (climate oscillations, fishing, eutrophication).

  16. review Richardson A.J. et al. (2009). The jellyfish joyride: causes, consequences and management responses to a more gelatinous future. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. link

    Policy-oriented review of rising jellyfish dominance in marine ecosystems and management options.

  17. peer-reviewed Sanz-Martin M. et al. (2018). Claims that anthropogenic stressors facilitate jellyfish blooms have been amplified beyond the available evidence. Frontiers in Marine Science. link

    Review linking human activities (fishing, eutrophication, climate) to jellyfish blooms and societal impacts.

  18. media Gershwin L. (2013). Stung! On Jellyfish Blooms and the Future of the Ocean. University of Chicago Press.

    News report or book on jellyfish swarms shutting nuclear plants, desalination, or coastal infrastructure.

  19. media Sixth Tone (2024). Gridlocked: When Jellyfish Brought a China Power Plant to Its Knees. Sixth Tone. link

    News report or book on jellyfish swarms shutting nuclear plants, desalination, or coastal infrastructure.

  20. review Graham W.M. et al. (2014). Linking human well-being and jellyfish ecosystem services and disservices. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. link

    Ecosystem services jellyfish provide (carbon cycling, food web links) alongside their nuisances.

  21. org European Commission (2011). EcoJel project: jellyfish occurrence and management in the Irish Sea. European Union Regional Policy. link

    Jellyfish biology, blooms, impacts, or management in coastal and open-ocean systems.

  22. review Uye S. (2008). Blooms of the giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai in the East Asian marginal seas: review and synthesis. Plankton and Benthos Research. link

    Ecology and fisheries impacts of giant Nomura's jellyfish (Nemopilema nomurai) in East Asian seas.

  23. media NHK News (2011). Jellyfish affected cooling-water intake operation at Shimane nuclear station. NHK archives.

    Jellyfish or debris blocking power-plant cooling-water intakes — field tests, incidents, or management guidance.

  24. peer-reviewed Dong J. et al. (2010). Bloom dynamics of jellyfish in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea. Progress in Natural Science.

    Trends, causes, or ecosystem effects of increasing jellyfish populations and blooms worldwide.

  25. review Boero F. et al. (2016). Jellyfish surge in the Mediterranean Sea: threat or opportunity? Mediterranean Marine Science. link

    Operational guidance or monitoring programs for jellyfish in Mediterranean, Black Sea, or NOAA waters.

  26. media The Times of Israel (2019). Jellyfish clog desalination plant intake systems during summer blooms. The Times of Israel. link

    Jellyfish or debris blocking power-plant cooling-water intakes — field tests, incidents, or management guidance.

  27. peer-reviewed Fenner P.J., Williamson J.A., Burnett J.W. (2010). Irukandji and Chironex box jellyfish envenomation. Wilderness and Environmental Medicine. link

    Medical and ecological aspects of dangerous box jellyfish (Chironex, Irukandji) in Australia and tropics.

  28. peer-reviewed Brodeur R.D. et al. (2002). Rise and fall of jellyfish in the eastern Bering Sea in relation to climate regime shifts. Progress in Oceanography. link

    How climate change and ocean warming influence jellyfish bloom formation.

  29. peer-reviewed Kideys A.E. (2002). Fall and rise of the Black Sea ecosystem and the anchovy fishery: effects of gelatinous zooplankton on marine food webs. Marine Ecology Progress Series. link

    How gelatinous zooplankton reshaped Black Sea food webs and collapsed anchovy fisheries.

  30. review Pitt K.A., Lucas C.H. (2014). Jellyfish Blooms. Springer. link

    Trends, causes, or ecosystem effects of increasing jellyfish populations and blooms worldwide.

  31. peer-reviewed Brotz L. et al. (2012). Increasing jellyfish populations: trends in large marine ecosystems. Hydrobiologia. link

    Trends, causes, or ecosystem effects of increasing jellyfish populations and blooms worldwide.

  32. peer-reviewed Brotz L. et al. (2012). Global analysis of jellyfish fisheries and blooms. Marine Biology. link

    Trends, causes, or ecosystem effects of increasing jellyfish populations and blooms worldwide.

  33. media BBC News (2011). Torness nuclear power station shut after jellyfish swarm. BBC. link

    News report or book on jellyfish swarms shutting nuclear plants, desalination, or coastal infrastructure.

  34. media The Guardian (2013). Swedish reactor at Oskarshamn shut by jellyfish. The Guardian. link

    News report or book on jellyfish swarms shutting nuclear plants, desalination, or coastal infrastructure.

  35. media Energy Voice (2020). Drones and imaging tested for jellyfish early warning at cooling intakes. Energy Voice. link

    Jellyfish biology, blooms, impacts, or management in coastal and open-ocean systems.

  36. peer-reviewed Burnett J.W., Gable W.D. (1989). A fatal jellyfish envenomation by Chironex fleckeri. Toxicon. link

    Medical and ecological aspects of dangerous box jellyfish (Chironex, Irukandji) in Australia and tropics.

  37. review Popper A.N., Hawkins A.D. (2019). An overview of fish bioacoustics and the impacts of anthropogenic sounds. Journal of Fish Biology. link

    Overview of fish hearing and impacts of human-made underwater noise on fish.

  38. org State Intellectual Property Office of China (2017). CN106973350A: Infrasound jellyfish repelling device. CN Patent. link

    How fish react to infrasound near industrial intakes; basis for acoustic fish deterrent (AFD) systems.

  39. review Nestler J.M. et al. (1992). Behavior barriers and fish guidance systems at water intakes. American Fisheries Society Symposium.

    Jellyfish or debris blocking power-plant cooling-water intakes — field tests, incidents, or management guidance.

  40. peer-reviewed Lo W.T. et al. (2008). Population outbreaks of jellyfish and links to environmental change around Taiwan. Fisheries Science.

    Trends, causes, or ecosystem effects of increasing jellyfish populations and blooms worldwide.

  41. peer-reviewed Arai M.N. (2009). The potential importance of podocysts to the formation of scyphozoan blooms: a review. Hydrobiologia. link

    Peer-reviewed research paper on the topic cited above. Focus: «The potential importance of podocysts to the formation of scyphozoan blooms: a review».

  42. review Purcell J.E. (2012). Jellyfish and ctenophore blooms coincide with human proliferations and environmental perturbations. Annual Review of Marine Science. link

    Trends, causes, or ecosystem effects of increasing jellyfish populations and blooms worldwide.

  43. review Lucas C.H., Gelcich S., Uye S., Brotz L. (2014). Gelatinous zooplankton and ecosystem services. Advances in Marine Biology. link

    Review article summarizing current knowledge on the cited topic. Focus: «Gelatinous zooplankton and ecosystem services».

  44. peer-reviewed Canepa A., Fuentes V., Sabates A., Piraino S., Boero F. (2014). Pelagia noctiluca in Mediterranean coastal systems and implications for tourism and fisheries. Marine Biology.

    Pelagia noctiluca blooms in the Mediterranean — tourism, fisheries, and ecosystem effects.

  45. review Hays G.C., Doyle T.K., Houghton J.D.R. (2018). A paradigm shift in jellyfish research priorities. Frontiers in Marine Science. link

    Jellyfish biology, blooms, impacts, or management in coastal and open-ocean systems.

  46. org FAO (2018). Jellyfish fisheries and aquaculture in Asia: status and prospects. Food and Agriculture Organization. link

    Interactions between jellyfish and fisheries — predation, bycatch, or economic losses.

  47. peer-reviewed Kawahara M., Uye S., Ohtsu K., Iizumi H. (2006). Unusual population explosion of the giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai in East Asian waters. Plankton and Benthos Research. link

    Ecology and fisheries impacts of giant Nomura's jellyfish (Nemopilema nomurai) in East Asian seas.

  48. peer-reviewed Sand O., Enger P.S., Karlsen H.E. (2000). Detection of infrasound and linear acceleration in fish and behavioral avoidance responses. Journal of Experimental Biology. link

    How fish react to infrasound near industrial intakes; basis for acoustic fish deterrent (AFD) systems.

  49. org GFCM and FAO (2013). Review of jellyfish blooms in the Mediterranean and Black Sea. GFCM Studies and Reviews. link

    How gelatinous zooplankton reshaped Black Sea food webs and collapsed anchovy fisheries.

  50. review Graham W.M., Martin D.L., Felder D.L., Asper V.L., Perry H.M. (2003). Ecological and economic implications of gelatinous zooplankton blooms. Marine Ecology Progress Series. link

    Review article summarizing current knowledge on the cited topic. Focus: «Ecological and economic implications of gelatinous zooplankton blooms».

  51. peer-reviewed Bedard A.J. (2005). Low-frequency atmospheric acoustic energy associated with vortices produced by thunderstorms. Monthly Weather Review. link

    Infrasound generated by severe storms, tornadoes, or thunderstorm vortices.

  52. peer-reviewed Marchetti E., Ripepe M., Ulivieri G., Kogelnig A. (2015). Infrasound array criteria for automatic detection and front velocity estimation of snow avalanches. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. link

    Infrasound arrays for automatic avalanche detection and front-velocity estimation in mountains.

  53. peer-reviewed Mayer S., van Herwijnen A., Ulivieri G., Schweizer J. (2020). Evaluating the performance of an operational infrasound avalanche detection system. Cold Regions Science and Technology. link

    Infrasound arrays for automatic avalanche detection and front-velocity estimation in mountains.

  54. org Wyssen Avalanche Control AG (2024). IDA Infrasound Detection System for avalanches. Wyssen technical documentation. link

    Infrasound arrays for automatic avalanche detection and front-velocity estimation in mountains.

  55. review van Kamp I., van den Berg F. (2018). Health effects related to wind turbine sound, including low-frequency sound and infrasound. Acoustics Australia. link

    Scientific review of health complaints vs. wind-turbine low-frequency sound and infrasound exposure.

  56. review McCunney R.J., Mundt K.A., Colby W.D., Dobie R., Kaliski K., Blais M. (2014). Wind turbines and health: a critical review of the scientific literature. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. link

    Scientific review of health complaints vs. wind-turbine low-frequency sound and infrasound exposure.

  57. org JASON Advisory Group (2018). An analysis of hypotheses related to embassy health incidents. U.S. Department of State report. link

    Investigation of reported sonic/infrasonic embassy incidents (Havana syndrome) and alternative explanations.

  58. peer-reviewed Stubbs A.L., Montealegre-Z F. (2019). Recording of sonic attacks on U.S. diplomats in Cuba spectrally matches the calling song of a Caribbean cricket. bioRxiv. link

    Investigation of reported sonic/infrasonic embassy incidents (Havana syndrome) and alternative explanations.

  59. org Raspberry Shake S.A. (2026). Raspberry Shake and Boom citizen seismo-acoustic network. Raspberry Shake. link

    Citizen seismo-acoustic network hardware (Raspberry Shake/Boom) for low-cost ground and air monitoring.

  60. org Bosch Sensortec (2026). BMP388 high-accuracy barometric pressure sensor. Product documentation. link

    High-accuracy barometric MEMS sensor (BMP388 class) usable for infrasound and microbarom studies.

  61. org ARISE Consortium (2026). Atmospheric dynamics Research InfraStructure in Europe. ARISE project. link

    ARISE European research infrastructure integrating infrasound, lidar, and radar for atmospheric dynamics.

  62. review Fee D., Matoza R.S. (2013). An overview of volcano infrasound: from Hawaiian to Plinian, local to global. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. link

    Using infrasound to detect, locate, and warn of volcanic eruptions from local to global scale.

  63. review Watson L.M., Matoza R.S., Fee D., et al. (2022). Volcano infrasound: progress and future directions. Bulletin of Volcanology. link

    Using infrasound to detect, locate, and warn of volcanic eruptions from local to global scale.

  64. peer-reviewed Moller H., Pedersen C.S. (2004). Hearing at low and infrasonic frequencies. Noise and Health. link

    Peer-reviewed research paper on the topic cited above. Focus: «Hearing at low and infrasonic frequencies».

  65. peer-reviewed Ardhuin F., Stutzmann E., Schimmel M., Mangeney A. (2011). Ocean wave sources of seismic noise. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. link

    Peer-reviewed research paper on the topic cited above. Focus: «Ocean wave sources of seismic noise».

  66. peer-reviewed Langbauer W.R., Payne K.B., Charif R.A., Rapaport L., Osborn F. (1991). African elephants respond to distant playbacks of low-frequency conspecific calls. Journal of Experimental Biology. link

    How elephants use low-frequency calls and ground-borne vibrations for communication and navigation.

  67. peer-reviewed Garstang M. et al. (2005). The daily cycle of low-frequency elephant calls and near-surface atmospheric conditions. Earth Interactions. link

    Peer-reviewed research paper on the topic cited above. Focus: «The daily cycle of low-frequency elephant calls and near-surface atmospheric conditions».

  68. peer-reviewed Edwards W.N., Brown P.G., ReVelle D.O. (2006). Estimates of meteoroid kinetic energies from observations of infrasonic airwaves. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics. link

    Estimating meteoroid energy and trajectory from infrasonic airwaves of bolides and fireballs.

  69. peer-reviewed McDonald M.A., Hildebrand J.A., Mesnick S. (2009). Worldwide decline in tonal frequencies of blue whale songs. Endangered Species Research. link

    Blue/fin whale vocalizations, source levels, propagation, or long-term song frequency trends.

  70. peer-reviewed Hedlin M.A.H., Alcoverro B., D'Spain G. (2003). Evaluation of rosette infrasonic noise-reducing spatial filters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. link

    Spatial filter designs (rosette arrays) to reduce wind noise in infrasound measurements.

  71. peer-reviewed Assink J.D., Averbuch G., Shani-Kadmiel S., Smets P., Evers L. (2018). A seismo-acoustic analysis of the 2017 North Korean nuclear test. Seismological Research Letters. link

    Joint seismic and infrasound analysis locating and characterizing underground nuclear explosions.

  72. peer-reviewed Anderson J.F., Johnson J.B., Bowman D.C., Ronan T.J. (2018). The Gem infrasound logger and custom-built instrumentation. Seismological Research Letters. link

    Low-cost infrasound logger hardware (Gem and similar) for field and educational monitoring.

  73. peer-reviewed Marcillo O., Johnson J.B., Hart D. (2012). An inexpensive low-power low-noise infrasound sensor for local and regional monitoring. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. link

    Design of affordable, low-power infrasound sensors for dense local and regional networks.

  74. peer-reviewed Clive M.A. et al. (2024). Crowdsourcing human observations expands and enhances volcano monitoring records. Communications Earth and Environment. link

    Combining citizen observations with instrument data to improve volcano monitoring records.

  75. peer-reviewed Cansi Y. (1995). An automatic seismic event processing for detection and location: the PMCC method. Geophysical Research Letters. link

    PMCC algorithm — standard method for detecting and locating infrasonic phases on array data.

Sources 76-150
  1. peer-reviewed Vergoz J. et al. (2022). International Monitoring System infrasound data products for atmospheric studies and civilian applications. Earth System Science Data. link

    CTBTO International Monitoring System infrasound stations and open data for science and civil use.

  2. peer-reviewed Kubota T., Saito T., Nishida K. (2022). Global fast-traveling tsunamis driven by atmospheric Lamb waves on the 2022 Tonga eruption. Science. link

    Global seismo-acoustic signals from the 2022 Hunga Tonga eruption — Lamb waves and tsunamis.

  3. peer-reviewed Streby H.M. et al. (2015). Tornadic storm avoidance behavior in breeding songbirds. Current Biology. link

    Birds detecting distant severe weather via infrasound and evacuating breeding sites before tornadoes.

  4. peer-reviewed Bishop J.W. et al. (2022). Deep learning categorization of infrasound array data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. link

    Machine-learning classification of infrasound array recordings for automated event detection.

  5. peer-reviewed Jesus M.C. et al. (2024). Low-cost small-aperture arrays improve infrasound monitoring in the Azores. Pure and Applied Geophysics. link

    Affordable infrasound arrays or mobile platforms (INFRA-EAR, small-aperture) for regional monitoring.

  6. peer-reviewed Den Ouden O.F.C., Assink J.D., Oudshoorn C.D., Filippi D., Evers L.G. (2021). The INFRA-EAR low-cost mobile infrasound platform. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. link

    Affordable infrasound arrays or mobile platforms (INFRA-EAR, small-aperture) for regional monitoring.

  7. peer-reviewed Lamb O.D. et al. (2021). Assessing Raspberry Shake and Boom sensors for recording African elephant vocalizations. Frontiers in Conservation Science. link

    Citizen seismo-acoustic network hardware (Raspberry Shake/Boom) for low-cost ground and air monitoring.

  8. peer-reviewed Brissaud Q. et al. (2021). First detection of an earthquake from a balloon using its acoustic signature. Geophysical Research Letters. link

    Detecting earthquakes from high-altitude balloon recordings of acoustic signatures.

  9. peer-reviewed Ravanelli M. et al. (2023). Tsunami and Lamb-wave ionospheric signatures from the 2022 Tonga eruption. Pure and Applied Geophysics. link

    Global seismo-acoustic signals from the 2022 Hunga Tonga eruption — Lamb waves and tsunamis.

  10. review Duarte C.M. et al. (2021). The soundscape of the Anthropocene ocean. Science. link

    Review of human-made and natural ocean soundscapes in the Anthropocene era.

  11. review Woith H., Petersen G.M., Hainzl S., Dahm T. (2018). Earthquake prediction by animals revisited: evidence standards and limitations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. link

    Review article summarizing current knowledge on the cited topic. Focus: «Earthquake prediction by animals revisited: evidence standards and limitations».

  12. peer-reviewed Allen R.M. et al. (2025). Global earthquake detection and warning using Android phones. Science. link

    Using smartphone accelerometers globally for earthquake detection and early warning.

  13. peer-reviewed Johnson J.B. et al. (2023). Infrasound detection of approaching lahars. Scientific Reports. link

    Infrasound signatures of approaching lahars (volcanic mudflows) for early warning.

  14. peer-reviewed Marchetti E. et al. (2019). Infrasound array analysis of debris-flow activity and implications for early warning. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. link

    Infrasound monitoring of debris flows for hazard early warning in mountains.

  15. peer-reviewed Crichton F., Dodd G., Schmid G., Gamble G., Petrie K.J. (2014). The link between health complaints and wind turbines: support for the nocebo expectations hypothesis. Frontiers in Public Health. link

    Scientific review of health complaints vs. wind-turbine low-frequency sound and infrasound exposure.

  16. history Tandy V., Lawrence T.R. (1998). The ghost in the machine. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research. link

    Classic note linking infrasound from fans to haunted-building sensations (19 Hz resonance).

  17. peer-reviewed von Muggenthaler E. (2000). Infrasonic and low-frequency vocalizations from Siberian and Bengal tigers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. link

    Infrasonic and low-frequency vocalizations in big cats (tigers) for long-range communication.

  18. peer-reviewed Watkins W.A. et al. (2004). Twelve years of tracking 52-Hz whale calls from a unique source in the North Pacific. Deep-Sea Research Part I. link

    Blue/fin whale vocalizations, source levels, propagation, or long-term song frequency trends.

  19. peer-reviewed Ripepe M. et al. (2018). Infrasonic early warning system for explosive eruptions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. link

    Peer-reviewed research paper on the topic cited above. Focus: «Infrasonic early warning system for explosive eruptions».

  20. peer-reviewed Ripepe M. et al. (2021). Dense seismo-acoustic network warning of the 2019 paroxysmal Stromboli eruptions. Scientific Reports. link

    Peer-reviewed research paper on the topic cited above. Focus: «Dense seismo-acoustic network warning of the 2019 paroxysmal Stromboli eruptions».

  21. org NOAA PMEL (2026). The Bloop and cryogenic icequake source identification. NOAA PMEL Acoustics Program. link

    NOAA identification of the famous «Bloop» sound as ice-related, not biological.

  22. peer-reviewed Mack A.L., Jones J. (2003). Low-frequency vocalizations by cassowaries Casuarius spp. The Auk. link

    Peer-reviewed research paper on the topic cited above. Focus: «Low-frequency vocalizations by cassowaries Casuarius spp».

  23. peer-reviewed Hetzer C.H., Gilbert K.E., Waxler R., Talmadge C.L. (2008). Infrasound from hurricanes and dependence on ocean surface-wave fields. Geophysical Research Letters. link

    Infrasound radiated by hurricanes and its dependence on ocean surface waves.

  24. peer-reviewed De Carlo M., Ardhuin F., Le Pichon A. (2020). Atmospheric infrasound generation by ocean waves in finite depth. Geophysical Journal International. link

    Research on atmospheric or ocean-coupled infrasound sources, propagation, or monitoring.

  25. peer-reviewed Reber S.A. et al. (2017). Formants provide honest acoustic cues to body size in American alligators. Scientific Reports. link

    Alligator bellows use infrasonic formants as honest cues to body size in mating.

  26. peer-reviewed Freeman A.R., Hare J.F. (2015). Infrasound in mating displays: a peacock's tale. Animal Behaviour. link

    Peacock mating displays include infrasonic components detectable by females.

  27. peer-reviewed Barklow W.E. (2004). Low-frequency sounds and amphibious communication in Hippopotamus amphibius. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. link

    Low-frequency underwater and amphibious communication in hippopotamuses.

  28. peer-reviewed Wilson C.R., Olson J.V. (2005). High trace-velocity infrasound from pulsating auroras at Fairbanks, Alaska. Geophysical Research Letters. link

    Infrasound coupled to pulsating aurora and upper-atmosphere energy deposition.

  29. peer-reviewed Longuet-Higgins M.S. (1950). A theory of the origin of microseisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. link

    Theory and observations of microseisms — seismic noise driven by ocean waves.

  30. peer-reviewed Campus P., Christie D.R. (2010). Worldwide observations of infrasonic waves. Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies. link

    Research on atmospheric or ocean-coupled infrasound sources, propagation, or monitoring.

  31. peer-reviewed Le Pichon A., Blanc E., Hauchecorne A. (2010). Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies. Springer. link

    Research on atmospheric or ocean-coupled infrasound sources, propagation, or monitoring.

  32. peer-reviewed Matoza R.S. et al. (2022). Atmospheric waves and global seismoacoustic observations of the January 2022 Hunga eruption. Science. link

    Peer-reviewed research paper on the topic cited above. Focus: «Atmospheric waves and global seismoacoustic observations of the January 2022 Hunga eruption».

  33. peer-reviewed Le Pichon A. et al. (2013). The 2013 Russian fireball largest ever detected by CTBTO infrasound sensors. Geophysical Research Letters. link

    Estimating meteoroid energy and trajectory from infrasonic airwaves of bolides and fireballs.

  34. peer-reviewed Le Pichon A. et al. (2005). Infrasound associated with 2004-2005 large Sumatra earthquakes and tsunami. Geophysical Research Letters. link

    Infrasound and seismo-acoustic observations of the 2004 Sumatra earthquake and tsunami.

  35. review Garces M. et al. (2005). Infrasound associated with the 2004 Sumatra megathrust earthquake and tsunami. Acoustical Society of America lay language paper. link

    Infrasound and seismo-acoustic observations of the 2004 Sumatra earthquake and tsunami.

  36. peer-reviewed Bittner M., Hoppner K., Pilger C., Schmidt C. (2010). Mesopause temperature perturbations caused by infrasonic waves as a potential indicator for detection of tsunamis. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. link

    Peer-reviewed research paper on the topic cited above. Focus: «Mesopause temperature perturbations caused by infrasonic waves as a potential indicator for detection of tsunamis».

  37. history Symons G.J. (1888). The Eruption of Krakatoa and Subsequent Phenomena. Royal Society. link

    Historic Krakatoa 1883 eruption — among the loudest infrasonic events recorded globally.

  38. review Gabrielson T.B. (2004). Krakatoa and the Royal Society: the Krakatoa explosion of 1883. Acoustics Today. link

    Historic Krakatoa 1883 eruption — among the loudest infrasonic events recorded globally.

  39. media Cox A. (2014). The sound so loud that it circled the Earth four times. Nautilus. link

    News article or popular book reporting jellyfish/infrasound events or trends. Focus: «The sound so loud that it circled the Earth four times».

  40. peer-reviewed Payne K.B., Langbauer W.R., Thomas E.M. (1986). Infrasonic calls of the Asian elephant Elephas maximus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. link

    How elephants use low-frequency calls and ground-borne vibrations for communication and navigation.

  41. peer-reviewed O'Connell-Rodwell C.E. (2007). Keeping an ear to the ground: seismic communication in elephants. Physiology. link

    How elephants use low-frequency calls and ground-borne vibrations for communication and navigation.

  42. peer-reviewed Mortimer B., Rees W.L., Koelemeijer P., Nissen-Meyer T. (2018). Classifying elephant behaviour through seismic vibrations. Current Biology. link

    How elephants use low-frequency calls and ground-borne vibrations for communication and navigation.

  43. org Elephant Listening Project (2026). Forest elephant acoustic monitoring methods and data. Cornell University. link

    Report, patent, or technical documentation from an organization or industry body. Focus: «Forest elephant acoustic monitoring methods and data».

  44. org NOAA Ocean Explorer (2026). The SOFAR channel and long-range underwater sound propagation. NOAA. link

    Report, patent, or technical documentation from an organization or industry body. Focus: «The SOFAR channel and long-range underwater sound propagation».

  45. peer-reviewed Cummings W.C., Thompson P.O. (1971). Underwater sounds from the blue whale Balaenoptera musculus. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. link

    Blue/fin whale vocalizations, source levels, propagation, or long-term song frequency trends.

  46. peer-reviewed Sirovic A., Hildebrand J.A., Wiggins S.M. (2007). Blue and fin whale call source levels and propagation range in the Southern Ocean. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. link

    Blue/fin whale vocalizations, source levels, propagation, or long-term song frequency trends.

  47. peer-reviewed Hagstrum J.T. (2013). Atmospheric propagation modeling indicates homing pigeons use loft-specific infrasound for navigation. Journal of Experimental Biology. link

    Hypothesis and evidence that homing pigeons navigate using loft-specific infrasonic maps.

  48. peer-reviewed Mills C.E. (2001). Jellyfish blooms: are populations increasing globally in response to changing ocean conditions? Hydrobiologia. link

    Large-scale drivers of recurring jellyfish blooms (climate oscillations, fishing, eutrophication).

  49. review Purcell J.E. (2005). Climate effects on formation of jellyfish and ctenophore blooms: a review. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. link

    Trends, causes, or ecosystem effects of increasing jellyfish populations and blooms worldwide.

  50. review Pitt K.A., Welsh D.T., Condon R.H. (2011). Influence of jellyfish blooms on carbon, nutrient and oxygen dynamics and pelagic-benthic coupling. Marine Ecology Progress Series. link

    Trends, causes, or ecosystem effects of increasing jellyfish populations and blooms worldwide.

  51. peer-reviewed Lynam C.P., Gibbons M.J., Axelsen B.E., Sparks C.A.J., Coetzee J., Heywood B.G., Brierley A.S. (2006). Jellyfish overtake fish in a heavily fished ecosystem. Current Biology. link

    Jellyfish biology, blooms, impacts, or management in coastal and open-ocean systems.

  52. peer-reviewed Licandro P., Conway D.V.P., Daly Yahia M.N., Fernandez de Puelles M.L., Gasparini S., Hecq J.H., Tranter P., Kirby R.R. (2010). A blooming jellyfish in the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean. Biology Letters. link

    Trends, causes, or ecosystem effects of increasing jellyfish populations and blooms worldwide.

  53. peer-reviewed Doyle T.K., Hays G.C., Harrod C., Houghton J.D.R. (2014). Ecological and societal benefits of jellyfish. In Jellyfish Blooms. Springer. link

    Trends, causes, or ecosystem effects of increasing jellyfish populations and blooms worldwide.

  54. peer-reviewed Mianzan H.W., Mari N., Prenski B., Sanchez F. (2001). Fish predation on Neritic medusae from the Argentine coast. Fisheries Research. link

    Peer-reviewed research paper on the topic cited above. Focus: «Fish predation on Neritic medusae from the Argentine coast».

  55. peer-reviewed Schnedler-Meyer N.A., Mariani P., Kiørboe T. (2018). The global susceptibility of coastal plankton communities to jellyfish predation under climate change. Scientific Reports. link

    Interactions between jellyfish and fisheries — predation, bycatch, or economic losses.

  56. peer-reviewed Kawahara M., Uye S. (2012). Seasonal cycles and fisheries impacts of Nemopilema nomurai in the Japan Sea. Fisheries Oceanography.

    Ecology and fisheries impacts of giant Nomura's jellyfish (Nemopilema nomurai) in East Asian seas.

  57. peer-reviewed Purcell J.E., Malej A., Benovic A. (1999). Potential links of jellyfish to eutrophication and fisheries in the Adriatic Sea. Scientia Marina.

    Interactions between jellyfish and fisheries — predation, bycatch, or economic losses.

  58. peer-reviewed Brotz L., Cheung W.W.L., Kleisner K., Pakhomov E., Pauly D. (2012). Increasing jellyfish populations in developing marine ecosystems and fisheries implications. Marine Biology. link

    Trends, causes, or ecosystem effects of increasing jellyfish populations and blooms worldwide.

  59. media Reuters (2011). Jellyfish force shutdown at Torness nuclear power station in Scotland. Reuters. link

    News report or book on jellyfish swarms shutting nuclear plants, desalination, or coastal infrastructure.

  60. media Japan Times (2009). Giant Nomura jellyfish plague fisheries and coasts in western Japan. Japan Times. link

    Interactions between jellyfish and fisheries — predation, bycatch, or economic losses.

  61. media ABC News Australia (2023). Box jellyfish and Irukandji season affects tourism and beach safety in northern Australia. ABC. link

    Medical and ecological aspects of dangerous box jellyfish (Chironex, Irukandji) in Australia and tropics.

  62. media Bangkok Post (2024). Jellyfish blooms and beach-warning campaigns on Thailand coasts. Bangkok Post. link

    Trends, causes, or ecosystem effects of increasing jellyfish populations and blooms worldwide.

  63. org NOAA Fisheries (2026). Understanding and responding to harmful jellyfish blooms in U.S. waters. NOAA. link

    Trends, causes, or ecosystem effects of increasing jellyfish populations and blooms worldwide.

  64. org FAO (2021). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2021: aquatic food systems and climate resilience. Food and Agriculture Organization. link

    Report, patent, or technical documentation from an organization or industry body. Focus: «The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2021: aquatic food systems and climate resilience».

  65. org GFCM (2024). Jellyfish Monitoring in the Mediterranean and Black Sea: operational guidance update. General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean. link

    How gelatinous zooplankton reshaped Black Sea food webs and collapsed anchovy fisheries.

  66. peer-reviewed Southall B.L. et al. (2007). Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: initial scientific recommendations. Aquatic Mammals. link

    Scientific criteria for safe noise exposure levels for marine mammals (shipping, sonar).

  67. peer-reviewed Southall B.L. et al. (2019). Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: updated scientific recommendations for residual hearing effects. Aquatic Mammals. link

    Scientific criteria for safe noise exposure levels for marine mammals (shipping, sonar).

  68. review Hildebrand J.A. (2009). Anthropogenic and natural sources of ambient noise in the ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series. link

    Natural vs. human-made ambient noise in the ocean and impacts on marine life.

  69. review Erbe C., Marley S.A., Schoeman R.P., Smith J.N., Trigg L.E., Embling C.B. (2019). The effects of ship noise on marine mammals: a review. Frontiers in Marine Science. link

    Scientific criteria for safe noise exposure levels for marine mammals (shipping, sonar).

  70. history Urick R.J. (1983). Principles of Underwater Sound. McGraw-Hill.

    Foundational textbook on underwater acoustics propagation, sonar, and ocean sound channels.

  71. review Au W.W.L., Hastings M.C. (2008). Principles of Marine Bioacoustics. Springer. link

    Principles of marine bioacoustics — how marine animals produce and perceive sound.

  72. org Google Patents (2019). CN110325742A: Jellyfish repelling and filtering system for seawater intakes. Chinese patent publication. link

    Jellyfish or debris blocking power-plant cooling-water intakes — field tests, incidents, or management guidance.

  73. org Google Patents (2020). CN111804409A: Acoustic jellyfish-prevention device for marine engineering intake structures. Chinese patent publication. link

    Patent or engineering concept for acoustic, bubble, or mechanical jellyfish deterrence at seawater intakes.

  74. org Google Patents (2018). CN108079339A: Bubble-curtain jellyfish interception method for coastal intakes. Chinese patent publication. link

    Patent or engineering concept for acoustic, bubble, or mechanical jellyfish deterrence at seawater intakes.

  75. org CTBTO Preparatory Commission (2026). Infrasound stations in the International Monitoring System. CTBTO. link

    CTBTO International Monitoring System infrasound stations and open data for science and civil use.

Sources 151-196
  1. peer-reviewed Nakanishi N., Hartenstein V., Jacobs D.K. (2009). Development of the rhopalial nervous system in Aurelia sp.1 (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa). Development Genes and Evolution 219(6), 301-317. link

    Confocal study showing gravity-sensing lithocyst and touch plate differentiate first in rhopalium development — core anatomy for how jellyfish statocysts wire into swimming control.

  2. peer-reviewed Becker A. et al. (2005). Calcium sulfate hemihydrate is the inorganic mineral in statoliths of Scyphozoan medusae (Cnidaria). Dalton Transactions 8, 1545-1550. link

    Identifies bassanite (CaSO4·0.5H2O) as the gravity-sensing crystal in scyphozoan statoliths across five species — foundational mineralogy for statocyst function.

  3. peer-reviewed Horridge G.A. (1969). Statocysts of medusae and evolution of stereocilia. Tissue and Cell 1(2), 341-353. link

    Classic hypothesis that jellyfish statocysts evolved from vibration receptors — kinocilium as transducer; directly relevant to vibration/hearing ancestry debate.

  4. peer-reviewed Singla C.L. (1975). Statocysts of hydromedusae. Cell and Tissue Research 158(3), 391-407. link

    Ultrastructure of hydromedusan statocysts with kinocilia and stereocilia — comparative cnidarian balance organ reference beyond scyphozoans.

  5. peer-reviewed Baranyk J. et al. (2025). Structural, molecular and developmental evidence for cell-type diversity in cnidarian mechanosensory neurons. Nature Communications 16, 56115. link

    Shows two mechanosensory hair-cell types in Nematostella with distinct polycystin-1/TRP roles for gentle vs harsh touch — molecular framework likely transferable to jellyfish statocyst hair cells.

  6. peer-reviewed Hündgen M., Biela C. (1982). Fine structure of touch-plates in the scyphomedusan Aurelia aurita. Journal of Ultrastructure Research 80(2), 178-184. link

    EM of Aurelia rhopalium touch-plate hair cells — the mechanoreceptor partner to the lithocyst in gravity and likely vibration sensing.

  7. peer-reviewed Sötje I. et al. (2011). Comparison of the statolith structures of Chironex fleckeri (Cubozoa) and Periphylla periphylla (Scyphozoa): a phylogenetic approach. Marine Biology 158(5), 1149-1161. link

    Comparative statolith morphology across cubozoan and scyphozoan rhopalia — phylogenetic context for gravity-sensor evolution in box vs moon jellyfish.

  8. peer-reviewed Holst S., Sötje I. (2011). Assessment of investigation techniques for scyphozoan statoliths, with focus on early development of the jellyfish Sanderia malayensis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 433, 241-254. link

    Methods paper confirming bassanite statolith composition and growth rings — enables age/development tracking tied to statocyst gravity function.

  9. peer-reviewed Tiemann H. et al. (2006). Calcium sulfate hemihydrate (bassanite) statoliths in the cubozoan Carybdea sp.. Zoologischer Anzeiger 245(1), 13-17. link

    Confirms bassanite statoliths in box jellyfish Carybdea — extends gravity-sensor mineralogy to cubozoan statocysts relevant to dangerous coastal species.

  10. peer-reviewed Albert D.J. (2007). Adaptive behaviours of the jellyfish Aurelia labiata in Roscoe Bay on the west coast of Canada. Journal of Sea Research 59(3), 198-201. link

    Field observations that Aurelia dive below turbulent ebb streams — key behavioral evidence that water motion/vibration cues drive statocyst-mediated depth control.

  11. peer-reviewed Albert D.J. (2006). Aurelia labiata medusae (Scyphozoa) in Roscoe Bay avoid tidal dispersion by vertical migration. Journal of Sea Research 57(4), 281-287. link

    Documents vertical migration behavior modulated by water-column depth and currents — links statocyst-guided swimming to population retention under hydrodynamic forcing.

  12. review Solé M. et al. (2023). Marine invertebrates and noise. Frontiers in Marine Science 10:1129057. link

    Comprehensive André-lab review of invertebrate sound detection and anthropogenic noise impacts including cnidarian statocysts — frames regulatory and R&D context beyond Solé 2016.

  13. peer-reviewed Edwards C.B. et al. (2024). Marine and Freshwater Sounds Impact Invertebrate Behavior and Physiology: A Meta-Analysis. Global Change Biology 30(11), e17593. link

    Meta-analysis of 46 studies (835 data points) showing anthropogenic noise harms aquatic invertebrate behavior and physiology — quantitative backdrop for statocyst injury concerns.

  14. review Prosnier L. (2024). Zooplankton as a model to study the effects of anthropogenic sounds on aquatic ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment 928, 172489. link

    Reviews scarce holozooplankton noise literature and calls for particle-motion dose-response curves — directly relevant to setting non-lethal acoustic deterrent limits.

  15. peer-reviewed McCauley R.D. et al. (2017). Widely used marine seismic survey air gun operations negatively impact zooplankton. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1, 0195. link

    Shows low-frequency impulsive sound kills zooplankton out to 1.2 km — sets scale/context for what intense LF exposure can do to gelatinous prey and ecosystem base.

  16. peer-reviewed Lo J.-M. (1991). Air bubble barrier effect on neutrally buoyant objects. Journal of Hydraulic Research 29(4), 437-455. link

    Lab flume study using neutrally buoyant floats as jellyfish surrogates — bubble curtain alone inadequate; net downstream recommended. Baseline for modern bubble-curtain intake protection.

  17. peer-reviewed Lo J.-M. (1996). Laboratory investigation of single floating booms and series of booms in the prevention of oil slick and jellyfish movement. Ocean Engineering 23(6), 519-531. link

    Combined air-bubble + floating-boom system lifts jellyfish surrogates to surface for suction removal — early integrated intake-protection design cited by EPRI.

  18. peer-reviewed Haberlin D., McAllen R., Doyle T.K. (2020). Field and flume tank experiments investigating the efficacy of a bubble curtain to keep harmful jellyfish out of finfish pens. Aquaculture 531, 735915. link

    Mixed field/flume results: high-flow curtain deflected large Chrysaora but not small hydromedusae; wave energy passes organisms through — honest efficacy limits for bubble deterrence.

  19. peer-reviewed C-CORE et al. (2023). Numerical Simulation of the Deflection of Jellyfish due to Air Bubble Curtains. OMAE 2023, OMAE2023-104966. link

    CFD+DEM model validated against flume tests for Bubble Tubing jellyfish deflection — engineering tool for scaling bubble curtains to power-plant intake currents.

  20. peer-reviewed Wang B. et al. (2025). Waterproof Fabric with Copper Ion-Loaded Multicompartmental Nanoparticle Coatings for Jellyfish Repellency. Pharmaceutics 18(1), 47. link

    Lab/field tests of copper-ion textile repelling jellyfish by membrane disruption — chemical deterrence comparator (sting protection, not intake-scale).

  21. patent GRE University of Alicante / UPV (2025). System for modifying the movement of jellyfish in marine environments (patent application P202530316). Spanish Patent Office application P202530316. link

    University of Alicante/UPV EM-field buoy system reducing jellyfish pulsations to steer them from intakes/bathing areas — novel non-acoustic deterrence prior art (efficacy claims, not peer-reviewed).

  22. peer-reviewed French G. et al. (2018). JellyMonitor: automated detection of jellyfish in sonar images using neural networks. IEEE ICSP 2018. link

    Embedded sonar+deep-NN system for real-time jellyfish bloom detection aimed at coastal power-station early warning — predecessor to UAV/CNN monitoring stack.

  23. peer-reviewed Schaub J. et al. (2018). Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to measure jellyfish aggregations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 591, 29-36. link

    Pairs UAV imagery with net hauls to estimate Aurelia aggregation biomass (65–117 t) — operational monitoring method for bloom approach detection.

  24. peer-reviewed Kim H. et al. (2015). Development of a UAV-type jellyfish monitoring system using deep learning. IEEE URAI 2015. link

    Early Korean UAV+deep-learning jellyfish recognition system for surface bloom surveillance — cited by JellyNet as prior art.

  25. peer-reviewed Kim D. et al. (2016). Image-Based Monitoring of Jellyfish Using Deep Learning Architecture. IEEE Sensors Journal 16(24), 8828-8836. link

    CNN-based jellyfish distribution recognition to improve removal-system efficiency — foundational computer-vision monitoring paper.

  26. peer-reviewed Kim D. et al. (2017). A jellyfish distribution management system using an unmanned aerial vehicle and unmanned surface vehicles. IEEE UT 2017. link

    UAV+USV coordinated system with >90% Aurelia recognition at 8 Hz without GPU — multi-platform bloom tracking architecture.

  27. peer-reviewed French G. et al. (2020). JellyNet: The convolutional neural network jellyfish bloom detector. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 91, 102279. link

    VGG-16 CNN on UAV imagery achieves 97.5% bloom detection accuracy with 6–8 h warning concept for coastal industries — directly models JellyWatch-style early alert.

  28. peer-reviewed Castro-Gutiérrez J. et al. (2024). Using artificial neural networks and citizen science data to assess jellyfish presence along coastal areas. Journal of Applied Ecology 61(9), 2244-2257. link

    MLP on Infomedusa citizen-science comments + SST/wind achieves ~96% classification — operational beach-scale presence forecasting template.

  29. peer-reviewed Albajes-Eizagirre A. et al. (2011). Jellyfish prediction of occurrence from remote sensing data and a non-linear pattern recognition approach. Proceedings of SPIE 8174. link

    Early ML model linking satellite ocean colour/SST to jellyfish occurrence probability — remote-sensing prediction lineage predating CNN approaches.

  30. peer-reviewed Moon J.-H. et al. (2010). Behavior of the giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai in the East China Sea and East/Japan Sea during the summer of 2005: A numerical model approach using a particle-tracking experiment. Journal of Marine Systems 80(1-2), 101-114. link

    Particle-tracking simulation of Nomura's jellyfish drift in 2005 — foundational ocean-model forecast approach later used for ~1-month migration warnings in Japan Sea.

  31. peer-reviewed Wang X. et al. (2023). Aggregation process of two disaster-causing jellyfish species, Nemopilema nomurai and Aurelia coerulea, at the intake area of a nuclear power cooling-water system in Eastern Liaodong Bay, China. Frontiers in Marine Science 9, 1098232. link

    Two-year field study correlating intake-area jellyfish biomass with SST and dissolved oxygen — site-specific drivers for NPP intake clogging prediction in China.

  32. peer-reviewed Wang X. et al. (2024). Source control of the blooming jellyfish: Mitigating threats for nuclear power plants. The Innovation Geoscience 3(2), 100126. link

    Reviews global NPP jellyfish shutdowns and argues polyp source-control + monitoring at aquaculture ponds feeding coastal aggregations — systems view of intake-risk mitigation.

  33. review Bosch-Belmar F. et al. (2020). Jellyfish Impacts on Marine Aquaculture and Fisheries. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture 29(1), 118-140. link

    Catalogues aquaculture/fisheries losses from jellyfish blooms (up to US$1.3M per event) including intake-adjacent operational impacts — economic framing for deterrence ROI.

  34. peer-reviewed Clinton M. et al. (2024). Clinical Presentation and Pathological Effects of a Hydrozoan Bloom on Farmed Atlantic Salmon. Journal of Fish Diseases 47, e14118. link

    Documents 2023 Norway Apolemia bloom killing millions of farmed salmon — scale of gelatinous zooplankton infrastructure harm beyond power-plant intakes.

  35. peer-reviewed Kim D.H. et al. (2022). Public willingness to pay for eradicating a harmful marine organism: the case of Aurelia aurita in South Korea. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29, 89909-89922. link

    Contingent valuation of Korean public WTP for Aurelia polyp eradication citing power-plant intake shutdown costs — monetized societal impact of intake clogging.

  36. review Mitchell K.A. et al. (2021). Impacts of jellyfish on marine cage aquaculture: an overview of existing knowledge and the challenges to finfish health. ICES Journal of Marine Science 78(5), 1557-1569. link

    Review of how jellyfish contact farmed fish via net penetration and polyp fouling — parallels intake-screen penetration physics for gelatinous organisms.

  37. review Haberlin D. et al. (2023). Mitigating and managing the impacts of gelatinous zooplankton on finfish aquaculture. Aquaculture 575, 740403. link

    Updated mitigation review covering bubble curtains, anti-jellyfish nets, and monitoring — comparative engineering menu adjacent to intake protection.

  38. review Ruiz-Frau A. et al. (2024). Management of jellyfish outbreaks to achieve good environmental status. Frontiers in Ocean Sustainability 2, 1449190. link

    EU policy-oriented review cataloguing jellyfish impacts on desalination, power plants, aquaculture and mitigation tools (nets, bubbles, screens).

  39. peer-reviewed López-Martínez M. et al. (2025). Unveiling the Environmental Drivers of Pelagia noctiluca Outbreaks: A Decadal Study Along the Mediterranean Coastline of Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 13(4), 642. link

    Decadal analysis of SST, nutrients, currents vs Pelagia blooms using GBIF+Jellywatch — environmental driver model for Mediterranean tourism/fishery risk.

  40. peer-reviewed Kitajima S. et al. (2017). Occurrence and potential prediction of the giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai off Hyogo Prefecture, southwestern Sea of Japan, during 2006–2015. Regional Studies in Marine Science 16, 1-8. link

    Ten-year observational dataset linking Nomura's jellyfish occurrence off Hyogo to oceanographic predictors — regional forecast calibration for fisheries/intake risk.

  41. media Reuters (2025). Swarm of jellyfish shuts French nuclear plant. reuters.com. link

    Reports Aug 2025 shutdown of four 900 MW reactors at Gravelines (France) due to jellyfish-clogged intake filters — contemporary intake-impact incident for cost/risk dossier.

  42. peer-reviewed Småge S.B. et al. (2017). Concurrent jellyfish blooms and tenacibaculosis outbreaks in Northern Norwegian Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) farms. PLOS ONE 12(11), e0187476. link

    Links Dipleurosoma typicum bloom to salmon skin damage and secondary bacterial disease in Finnmark net-pens — infrastructure-adjacent harm pathway beyond direct stinging.

  43. review Helm R.R. (2018). Evolution and development of scyphozoan jellyfish. Biological Reviews 93(2), 1228-1250. link

    Comprehensive review of scyphozoan life cycles, strobilation, and polyp–medusa transitions — essential for understanding bloom source populations (polyps) in monitoring/prediction.

  44. peer-reviewed Polo A. et al. (2022). Impacts of jellyfish presence on tourists' holiday destination choices and their willingness to pay for mitigation measures. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 65(11), 1985-2004. link

    Discrete-choice study: tourists WTP highest for exclusion nets vs flags/panels — economic justification for physical exclusion barriers as deterrence comparator.

  45. org Piraino S. et al. (2016). Are anti-jellyfish nets a useful mitigation tool for coastal tourism? Hindsight from the MED-JELLYRISK experience. 5th International Jellyfish Bloom Symposium, Barcelona (conference presentation). link

    Field report on 15 Mediterranean anti-jellyfish net deployments (2014–2015) with inside/outside surveys — physical net exclusion benchmark for coastal protection.

  46. peer-reviewed Park C.-D. et al. (2015). Analysis on underwater stability of the jellyfish sting protection net installed in the Haeundae beach. Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries Technology 51(1), 128-135. link

    Engineering field evaluation of beach protection net stability under currents up to 4,100 kg tension — physical barrier performance data for coastal exclusion systems.

See also
Share: Share X Facebook
How to cite · Copy
HERD (2026). Jellyfish, storms, and infrasound · plain-language guide. HERD — Infrasound library. https://theherd.network/infrasound/en/jellyfish